SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Del) 755

DEVENDER GUPTA, M.JAGANNADHA RAO
RAVI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MISHA VADHERA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.VALI, GITA MITTAL, H.L.TIKKU, SVANTANTAR KUMAR

M. Jagannadha Rao, C. J.

( 1 )

( 2 ) THIS is an appeal by the 1st defendant against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 8. 9. 94 in IA No. 7909 of 1994 in Suit No. 2828/93 appointing a Receiver in an application filed by the plaintiff-lst respondent, without service of the notice in the IA on the appellant.

( 3 ) THE appellant - 1st defendant Mr. Ravi Kumar is admittedly the owner of a flat with commercial space measuring 1106 sq. ft. on the first floor of a multi- storied building, namely, hansalaya , 15, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi. The appellant states that he is a non-resident Indian (NRI) and ha had earlier purchased this property by paying sale consideration in foreign exchange after taking the required permission from the Reserve Banit of India. The plaintiff-lst respondent Misha Vadhera is said to be a builder of the multi- storied building hansalaya and according to the appellant, the plaintiff is carrying on business in real-estate through respon dent 3, a real-estate agent (M/s Satish Pandit and Associates ). It is said that the appellant is carrying on business in names of respondent 2 (Hote- Hans Pvt. Ltd.) and respondent 4 (M/s Hansalaya Properties ). Appell



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top