SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 94

P.N.NAG
PREM KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
VED PARKASH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.SAINI, Sanjay Shangari

P. N. Nag, J.

( 1 ) THIS regular second appeal is directed against thejudgment and decree dated 4. 2. 1976 passed by Shri Jaspal Singh, Additionaldistrict Judge, Delhi (as he then was) whereby he has allowed the appeal andset aside the judgment and decree dated 30. 4. 1974 passed by Shri Gopalkrishan, Sub-Judge 1st Class, Delhi and dismissed the suit.

( 2 ) THE appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for declatation to the effect thatthe property No. WZ-61, Mahabir Nagar. New Delhi vested in the entirebody of legal heirs of deceased, Shri Malik Chand. He claimed that theplaintiff and defendants 1, 3 to 5 are the children of Shri Malik Chand anddefendant No. 2 is his widow. The plaintiff s father Shri Malik Chand hadpurchased one plot of land No. 47, measuring 200 sq. yards in Mahabirnagar, New Delhi in the benami name of defendant No. 1, i. e. , Shri Vedparkash, out of his own earnings and thereafter constructed a house thereonbearing the aforementioned house No. WZ-61 and also enjoyed the profitsthereof throughout his life. Defendant No. 1 is not the real owner of theproperty as he could not purchase the plot and raised construction thereon. In the year 1954, when the plot m question wa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top