SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 103

SAT PAL
MOHAMMAD LAIS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.Sud, R.D.Jolly

SAT PAL, J.

( 1 ) IN this case the petitioner was arrested under section 452/302 Indian Penal Code on 19th November, 1990 in connection with the murder of one Suit. Zamila Begum. After he was committed to the Court of Session tor trial, the petitioner moved an application before the learned Additional Sessions Judge for his release on bail on the ground that he was below 16 years of age on the date of commission of offence. While dealing with this application the learned Additional Sessions Judge was of the view that it would be in the interests of Justice to firstly determine the age of the petitioner and, therefore, he held an enquiry under section 32 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). In the aforesaid enquiry evidence was recorded and after hearing the learned counsel for the parlies, the learned Additional Sessions Judge by his order dated 26th June, 1992 held that the petitioner was juvenile at the lime of commission of offence under section 8 of the Act and directed that the record of proceeding of the petitioner he forwarded to the Court of Juvenile Justice for trial according to law.

( 2 ) WHEN the case was forwarded to the Court of









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top