Mr. P. K. Babri, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against order of the Rentcontrol Tribunal dated 10/07/1987, by which he dismissed the applicationof the tenant-appellant seeking setting aside of the eviction order dated 25/05/1983, made in Rent Control Appeal No. 109/83 by the Rent Controltribunal.

( 2 ) FACTS of the case, in brief, are that Mustaq Ram-petitioner No. 2 (since deceased) was the owner of Property No. 34, Krishna Market, Lajpatnagar-1, New Delhi and the property was being managed by his marrieddaughter Smt. Kanta Rani. Smt. K. anta Rani had let out the premises inquestion comprising of one room, verandah, temporary store, bath and W. C. located on the rear portion of the said property to the appellant-R. David ona monthly rent of Rs. 100. 00per month vide rent note dated 14/11/1967. The eviction petition was brought by Smt. Kanta Rani and Mustaqram against the tenant on the grounds of eviction covered by Clauses (a) and (e) of proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Delhi Rent Control Actpleading that in an earliar case for eviction brought by Smt. Kanta Raniagainst the tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent, the tenant had beengiven the benefit of Secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document