SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 122

C.L.CHAUDHRY
HIND TRADING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
DIDI MODES PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.KRISHAN, S.V.BAHADUR

C. L. Choudhry

( 1 ) M/s. Hind trading and Manufacturing Co. ,the plaintiff has filed this suit for recovery of possession and recovery oflicense fee and damages. The case set up by the plaintiff is that the plaintiffis the joint Hindu Family partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act. An intimation was sent to the Registrar of the Firms regardingthe change into the constitution of the Firm. The defendants attroned tothe partnership firm by paying licence fee and by other conduct. The plaintifffirm is the successor firm of the old firms. The plaint has been signed andverified by Sh. Mahendra Kumar Jain as the Managing Partner of the plaintiff firm. The defendant is stated to be a Private Limited Company registeredunder the Companies Act. Defendent No. 2 is its Managing Director. Theplaintiff firm had taken the site, Plot No 243 of Block B in the lay out ofokhla Industrial Area, Phase I, New Delhi from the President of India onperpetual Lease under the Deed dated 18/06/1973 and as such theplaintiff firm is the perpetual lessee of the site Plot B-243. After taking thesaid plot on lease, the plaintiff firm constructed the building to run industryfor the purpose of pro





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top