( 1 ) I propose to dispose of both these petitions bya common order. Cr M (M) 2800/92 is filed by four petitioners whereasthe second petition (Cr. M. (M) 2846/92) is filed by only two of them. Theseare tiled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, (Code forshort) and Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the first petition,the relief sought, is that the order dated 3. 9. 1992 of the learned M. M. forissuing processes under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code may be declarednull and void while in the second petition order for issue of non-bailablewarrants issued against them on 18. 8,92 is sought to be quashed, beingillegal and arbitrary as the petitioners were on bail and their bail had notbeen cancelled.

( 2 ) THE brief facts according to the story of the prosecution basedon the statement of Sh. Ved Parkash. injured (who subsequently died on8. 6. 92) are that at about 9. 45 a. m. on 29. 4. 1992 he was going from his housewith a Lota containing Lussi to his Baithak to meet his guests. When hereached near the house of Chander Pal petitioner, he found the petitionerslok Pal, Amrik Singh and Chander Pal emerging from the house of Chanderpal. They called him f