SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 203

R.L.GUPTA
RENU VOHRA – Appellant
Versus
SHREYANS PAPER MILLS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S.SINHA, O.P.Faizi, SUMAN KAPUR

R. L. GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code for short) against an order dated 14-1-1992 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Cr. R. No. 36 of 1991. After recording evidence in the complaint filed by respodent No. 1, the learned Magistrate was of the view that there were sufficient grounds for proceeding against the petitioners and others under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners filed a revision against that order. In the light of some authorities, learned Additional Sessions Judge came to the conclusion that the summoning order in this case was an interlocutory order, and so in view of the bar of Section 397 (2) of the Code, the revision was not maintainable.

( 2 ) THE complaint against the petitioners, their husbands and the firm M/s. Natraj Industries of which all four of them were, alleged to be partners, stated that the complainant was a public limited Co. having its registered office at Village Bhola Pur, District Ludhiana and one V. D souza was its Branch Manager holding a power of attorney. The firm of the pstitioners and their husbands had business dealing



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top