MOHD.SHAMIM
PRITPAL SINOHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application by one Pritpal Singhalto be released on bail.
( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and his son i. e. co-accused Suresh Singhal are the owners of a house situated at Behraenclave, New Delhi. They wanted to dispose the same of. Deceased Shyamsunder and Krishan Lal and injured Hans Raj and his brother Raj Kumaralias Raju were carrying on the business of property dca. hng under the nameand style of M/s. Vijay Properties at Bahadurgarh (Haryana ). S/shri Tilakraj, Tarsem Lal and Sarvar Lal all residents of Gurdaspur (Punjab) wantedto purchase the abovesaid property and a deal was struck for the purchaseof the said property for a consideration of Rs. 35 lacs. However, the saidconsideration was not passed on in full to the sellers and the same wasalleged to have been taken by the abovesaki property dealers, yet they werebringing pressure on the seller to execute the sale deed in respect of the saidproperty in favour of the proposed buyers. The sellers were, however, notready to submit to their demands. Deceased Shyam Sunder and his brotherraju approached the petitioner and his son on March 3, 19 91 and tried topressurise them t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.