SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 222

DALVEER BHANDARI
MALWINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
TEJ PRATAP SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.JAIN, D.D.BANGA, P.C.Jain, S.K.Kaul, SANJIV SACHDEVA

DALVEER BHANDARI, J.

( 1 ) BY this order, I propose to dispose of three separate applications which have been filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code. in this Suit. 1. A. 3642/90

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed I. A. 3642/90 under Order 6 Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code. The plaintiffs by this application had sought amendment, and want permission of this court to add paras 14a, 14b, 14c, 14d and some additions in para 17. I. A. 4144/90

( 3 ) THE plaintiffs had filed another I. A. 4144/90 under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Sectionl51 Civil Procedure Code. In this application, the plaintiffs want to add para 9a, after para 9. I. A. 3376/92

( 4 ) THEREAFTER, the plaintiffs filed another I. A. No-3376/92 under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code. In this application, the plaintiffs want that para no. 5 of the plaint and para no. 10a be added after para 10 of the plaint.

( 5 ) THE central question and main prayer sought in all the three applications is the same, therefore all the three I. As. are being disposed of by this order.

( 6 ) IN order to properly appreciate the amendments, which have been sought by the plaintiffs in these applications, it is


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top