SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 249

D.P.WADHWA, VIJENDER JAIN, VUENDER JAIN
DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE HIGH COURT OF DELHI – Respondent


D. P. WADHWA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, numbering two, by this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek a declaration that 4 of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 1991 (for short "the Amending Act") is ultra vires the Constitution and section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 (forshort the Principal Act"), and so also Notification No. 825 (E) dated 9 November 1992 of the Central Government in the Ministry of Law, Justice and Compiny Affairs, is ultra vires the Constitution and section 10 of the Principal Act. By the Amending Act the words "rupees one lakh" in sub-section (2) of section 5 of the Principal. Act were substituted with the words "rupees five lakhs". This meant that the High Court of Delhi would have ordinary original civil jurisdiction in every suit value of which exceeded rupees five lakhs. . The Amending Act received the assent of the President of India on 28 December 1991. Sub-section (2) of section 1 of the Amending Act provided that it shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may by notification in the official gazette appoint. This notification is No. 825 (E) dated 9 November 1992 and is being impugned. The Cent




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top