SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 258

USHA MEHRA
RADHA KISHAN SACHDEVA – Appellant
Versus
FLT. LT. L. D. SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.SABHARWAL, K.N.Kataria, N.S.Bajwa, P.N.Bhardwaj

USHA MEHRA, J.

( 1 ) RADHA Kishan. and others have come up inappeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter called the Act) assailing the order dated 29. 1 1. 80 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (hereinafter called the Tribunal), thereby dismissing the claim petition of the appellants. In nut shell, the facts are that Shri Rajinder Kumar Sachdeva met with a road accident caused by a two-wheeler scooter on 3. 7. 75 at about 4. 25 p. m. opposite WHO building. Ring Road. He died on 6. 7. 75 in the hospital. Rajinder Kumar was employed with the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking. He was 25 years old, unmarried at the time of his death. At about 4. 25 p. m. , the deceased alongwith his colleagues was walking on the kacha Patri in front of WHO building and was going towards Indraprastha Bus Depot. A person driving Scooter No. HRG-1975 came at a fast speed from the Ashram side and hit the deceased, because of the impact Rajinder Kumar fell down. He received severe head injuries. It is the case of the appellants that the driver of the scooter was negligent. He came on the Kacha Patri side, as a result of which the deceased sustained head injuries. His c






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top