SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 302

USHA MEHRA
BIIARAL BHUSHAN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
RAJ KUMAR GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.Kalia, V.B.ANDLEY

USHA MEHRA

( 1 ) A very short and interesting point has been raised in this Revision Petition, namely once the suit has been withdrawn by the plaintiff, can he revoke that withdrawal ?

( 2 ) THIS was the only point raised in this Revision Petition. There are no much facts involved in this case. The short and brief facts are that respondent herein filed a suit against the petitioner who happens to be his son. Summons of the suit were served on the petitioner on 8-1-1993 and he was required So appear in Court on 11-1-1993. On 10-1-1993, respondent herein met the petitioner according to the allegation and agreed to withdraw the suit against the petitioner. He made the following endorsement on 10-1-1993 on the summon issued by the Cour: to the defendant:

"i am withdrawing my above case against my son Bharat Bhushan Gupta which is pending in the Court of Shri Shiv Charan, Magistrate. Other legal formalities would be done by my Advocate,"

( 3 ) SUB rule (1) of Rule I of Order 23, Code of Civil Procedure. gives unqualified right to a plaintiff to withdraw or abandon a suit. Admittedly the Rules does not requi. re any order in the case of withdrawal. No leave or order is necessary. The permi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top