SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 322

MOHD.SHAMIM, SUNANDA BHANDARE
KIKKI FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.S.Mathur, JAGDEV SINGH, N.S.VASHISHT, S.K.MAHAJAN, SANJIV SINDHVANI, SASHI KIRAN

Sunanda Bhandare, J.

( 1 ) THIS bunch of ten writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been filed praying that a mandamus be issued directing respondent 110. 3 to register the document in favour of the petitioners in respect of the land purchased by them by way of sale deed.

( 2 ) THE respondents had refused to register the sale deed on the ground; i) that No Objection Certificate was not obtained by the petitioners under the provisions of Delhi Land (Restriction on Transfers) Act, 1972; and ii) that the Inspector General of Registration/chief Controlling Revenue Authority had issued instructions to the Sub Registrar vide office order dated 19th March 1990 fixing the minimum rate of land at Rs. 4. 65 lacs per acre in respect of land which was not in the River Belt and since the consideration mentioned in the sale deed is less than Rs. 4. 65 lacs per acre the sale deed cannot be registered.

( 3 ) IT was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that this Court in CWP 1268 of 1989 decided on 28th July 1989 has held that No Objection Certificate is not required to be obtained when the land is not under acquisition and thus the insistence of the resp










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top