( 1 ) THE present revision petition has been filed againstthe order dated 18/09/1992 passed by the learned Additionalsessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 24/1991. By the aforesaid orderthe learned Additional Sessions Judge held that, prima fade, a case againstall the accused including the petitioners is made oat for charging them undersections 302/102-B of the Indian Penal Code. The aforesaid order has beenchallenged by two of the accused, namely, Ashok Kumar and Kuldip Kumar.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case are that deceased Raj Kumarand one Ravi were in the employment of petitioner Ashok Kumar, who wasrunning a chit fund company. The petitioner Ashok Kumar lodged a reportwith the police against the aforesaid two persons on 8/03/1990 inrespect of the alleged mis-appropriation of Rs. 60,000. 00. After the aforesaidamount was returned to the petitioner Ashok Kumar, he gave a statement tothe police on 22/03/1990 that he did not want to press the case andaccordingly the case was filed.

( 3 ) IF is alleged that petitioner Kuldip Kumar visited the house of thedeceased on 15/06/1990 and introduced the co-accused Anoop Singh @bittoo and told the deceased that said