SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 295

ARUN MADAN, C.L.CHAUDHRY
MOTI RAM – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.Luthra

C. L. Chaudhry, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) MOTI Ram, the appellant owned land in Village Mandoli. The land was acquired in pursuance of a notification dated 10. 11. 1966 issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. Land Acquisition Collector assessed the market value of the land at Rs. 2,000. 00 per bigha. The appellant was not satisfied with the assessment made by the Land Acquisition Collector. He moved the District Judge under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of the compensation. By award dated 27. 5. 1991 the Additional District Judge enhanced the market value of the land from Rs. 2,000. 00 to Rs. 4,000. 00 per bigha besides the statutory solatium. Even then the appellant was not satisfied with the award of the District Judge and he preferrd this appeal in this Court.

( 2 ) THE appellant, in this appeal claimed compensation @ Rs. 6,000. 00 per bigha. There after, the appellant moved an application being C. M. 628/1992 under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the grounds of appeal. In the grounds of appeal substitution was sought from the claim of Rs. 6,000. 00 to Rs. 8,064. 00 per bigha. This application was allowed. The appellant has filed the amended ground




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top