SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 270

P.N.NAG
MILK FOOD LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KIRAN KHANNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.SUD, L.R.GUPTA, R.K.MAKHIJA, SANJIV SINDHVANI

Mr. P. N. Nag, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been tiled against theorder dated 16. 7. 1988 passed by Shri V. K. Jain, Additional Rent Controller,delhi whereby he has allowed the eviction petition of the respondent-landlady for bonafide requirement under Section 14 (l) (e) of the Delhi Rentcontrol Act (hereinafter referred to as the act ).

( 2 ) THE relevant facts set out in the pleadings of the parties necessaryfor determining the point in controversy are that the respondent, who hasstated herself to be the owner of Flat No. 6-B, Raj Hans, 33-Prithvi Raj Road,new Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the premises), let out these premises tomilk Food Ltd i. e. , the petitioner-tenant for the residence of its Managingdirector Shri K. S. Jaiswal at a monthly rent of Rs. 2. 000. 00 plus Rs. 600. 00 forfixtures (in all Rs. 2. 600. 00 per month ). The respondent s husband, viz. , Majorsatish Khanna who had been in military services was getting subsidiary fromthe Government under the rules of Military services for the accommodation;he and the respondent were living in a house in Delhi on rental basis while inmilitary service. However, the respondent s husband had been retired andrelie



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top