SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 482

MAHINDER NARAIN
LAMBA BROTHERS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
LAMBA BROTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PARVIN ANAND

Mahinder Narain,j.

( 1 ) IN this case, the plaintiff claims to be owner of copyright in a catalogue.

( 2 ) THE catalogue relates to machinery (Power Presses) manufactured by the Plaintiff, copyright wherein is alleged to have been infringed by another catalogue of the defendants.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff and defendants were carrying on business together at one time. They were functioning as partners and are real brothers. They were carrying on business in the name of elbee , l standing for Lamba and b for Brothers. These two alphabets LB made up in a word form of elbee .

( 4 ) ON dissolution of partnership w. e. f. 1. 4. 1985 by a Deed of Dissolution dated 20. 10. 1985, the two brothers appear to have carried on business independently.

( 5 ) THE plaintiff says that the two brothers are litigating about the trade mark elbee in another proceeding, with which we are not concerned here.

( 6 ) THIS suit is relatable to a "catalogue", actually it is no more than a Coloured. Brochure, which is claimed to have been made by one Mr. S. K. Bassi which catalogue/ brochure relates to the power presses which are manufactured and marketed by the plaintiff.

( 7 ) IN this catalogue, there are wr

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top