SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 517

A.D.SINGH
JAYANTI PRASAD GOEL – Appellant
Versus
SUMITRA JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.Andley, R.K.Bahri, S.K.Sharma

ANIL DEV SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by the petitioner-complainant under section 439 (2) ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for cancellation of bail of the respondents.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the father of the deceased Smt. Chhama Jain. On July 4, 1991 marriage of Chhama Jain was solemnised with Suresh Jain. On April 5, 1992 Chhama Jain died of burn injuries. At the time of death, she was six month s pregnant. The incident took place in the matrimonial home ofthe deceased.

( 3 ) ON April 6, 1992 the petitioner Jayanti Prasad Goel, father ofthe deceased lodged a report about the incident. In the report it was, inter-alia, stated that after four months of marriage, when Chhama came to the paternal house,she told him that her sisterin-law, Savitaand mother-in-law, Sumitra were harassing her for bringing insufficient dowry. After five and a half months of her departure to the in-law s house, Suresh husband of the deceased came to the house of the complainant and demanded a sum of Rs. 15,000. 00 but was given only Rs. 5,000. 00 by the complainant, as the financial position of the latter was not good. Thereafter Suresh accompanied by deceased again visited the complainant































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top