VUENDER JAIN, VIJENDER JAIN, D.P.WADHWA
NEW HORIZONS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE D. B.
( 2 ) THERE are two petitioners. First petitioner is a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and the second petitioner is the Director of the first petitioner. By this petition they seek to have issued a writ,direction or order in the nature of certiorari quashing the award of contract by respondents 1, 2 and 3 to respondent No. 4 for printing, binding and supply of telephone directory for Hyderabad. Then the petitioners seek a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus requiring the respondents 1, 2 and 3 to accept the tender of the first petitioner for the purpose aforementioned. The first respondent is the Union of India through the Secretary, Ministryof Communication, New Delhi; the second is the Chairman, Telecom Commission, Ministry of Communication, New Delhi; the third is the General Manager, Department of Telecommunications, Telecom District, Hyderabad; and the fourth respondent is M/s. M and N Pulications Limited, New Delhi, who have been awarded the contract.
( 3 ) A tender notice was published on 22 April 1993 by the General Manager, Hyderabad Telecommunications (Hyderabad Telecom) inviting sealed tend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.