The provisions of the Representation of People Act do not apply to elections to the committees of cooperative societies under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition challenges the order dated 16th April, 1993 passed by the Lt-Governor of Delhi in exercise of his powers under Section 31 (7) of the Delhi cooperative societies Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

( 2 ) THE Delhi State Cooperative Bank Limited is a financing bank within the meaning of Section 2 ( 1) of the Act and is duly registered as a society with the Registrar of cooperative societies, Delhi. It is thus a co-operative society. In a co-operative society the general body of members is supreme and it has the final authority in all matters. However, the day to day functioning of the society is entrusted to delegates of members of the society chosen in accordance with the bye-laws of the society and the law. This smaller body generally known as managing committee or committee exercises the powers of the general body. This concept is statutorily recognised in Section 28 of the Act. The elections of the members of the committee are normally held in the Annual General Body meeting of the cooperative society as provided in Section 29 of the Act.

( 3 ) THE Delhi State Cooperative Bank Limited falls in a distinct class of cooperative societies. Rule 58a of the Delhi Cooperative-Societies Rules,1973 contains the classification of cooperative societies for the purpose of Section 31of the Act and the Bank falls in that class being a financing bank. Section 31 of the Act contains provisions regarding election and nomination of members of committees of this class of cooperative societies. The following provisions of Section 31 of the Act are relevant for purpose of controversy involved in the present writ petition:

1) The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of the electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, elections of the members of the committees of such cooperative societies or class of co-operative societies as may be prescribed shall be vested in such returning officers not below the rank of gazetted officers as may be appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in this behalf. 2) The vote at such elections shall be by secret ballot, 7) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any dispute relating to election of members of any committee of a co-operative society men- tioned in sub-section (1) shall be referred to the Lieutenant Governor whose decision thereon shall be Final. 8) The Lieutenant Governor may make rules generally to provide for or to regulate matters in respect of elections of members of the committees.

( 4 ) THE Board of Directors of the Delhi State Co-operative Bank Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) was superceded by the Registrar, Co-operative I Societies in exercise of powers vested under Section 32 of the Act on 23rd July, 1990. For the purpose of reconstitution of the Board of Directors elections were ordered to be held and Shri P. R. Meena, Deputy Registrar was appointed as the Returning Officer. Shri P. R. Meena issued an Agenda Notice dated 13th April, 1992 notify ing a special General Body meeting of the Bank to be held on 3rd May,1992 at 8. 00 A. M. for conducting the election of the President and the Members of the Board of Directors of the Bank. The election took place inpursuance of the said Agenda Notice on 3rd May,1992 and the results were declared. The election was challenged through petitions filed under Section 31 (7) of the Act before the Lt. Governor of Delhi. Vide order dated 21st September, 1992, the Lt. Governor set aside the election and directed the Registrar, Co- operative Societies to take necessary steps for holding of fresh elections. The Lt. Governor also appointed an Administrator to look after the affairs of the Bank till a newly elected Board took over. The said order of the Lt. Governor was challenged by way of a writ petition filed in this Court. On 21st October, 1992 this Court set aside the order of the Lt. Governor dated 21 st September, 1992 and remanded the case for fresh adjudication by the Lt. G