SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 646

ARUN MADAN, B.N.KIRPAL
RAJINDER KAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Gumani, Ravinder Sethi, SUMiT BANSAL, V.K.Seth

B. N. Kirpal,j. (Oral)

( 1 ) SIX persons claiming to be owners of different plots of land in Village Kishan Garh in the revenue estate of Mehrauli, New Delhi have filed the present writ petition challenging the action of the respondents, which has been taken and/or being proposed ; to be taken, for demolishing structures which have been erected by the petitioners on the said plots. The petitioners also challenge the validity of the entries in the revenue records viz. , Khasra Girdawri in respect of the lands which they profess to own.

( 2 ) THE first two petitioners claim to have purchased land measuring 570 Sq. Yards from one Smt. Kusum Lata. It is averred in the writ petition that this land was purchased on the basis of an agreement to. sell executed by her in the name of both the petitioners jointly. Copy of the agreement to sell has not been placed on the record but the claim of the said petitioners is that they have been in occupation of the property in question since 13th June, 1986.

( 3 ) PETITIONER No. 3 is stated to have purchased 10 Sq. Yds of land by virtue of an agreement to sell executed by one Shri Gyanendra Sharma on 20th November, 1989. Copy of the said agreement has






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top