SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Del) 728

J.K.MEHRA
S. SONY AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.MARKANDA, V.K.Sharma

J. K. Mehra, J.

( 1 ) THESE are objections on behalf of the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "dda" under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act to the award of Shri R. K. Sundram, Sole arbitrator dated 16th March 1990. The award is in respect of the claims that arose out of the contract for plumbing and sanitary work in the players block of Indira Gandhi Indoor Stadium Complex which was to be used for the Asian Games.

( 2 ) NOTICE of the filing of the award was served on DDA on 17. 9. 90 and the present objections by DDA were filed on 17th October 1990. Thus the objections appear to be within time. The claims appear to be based on alleged loss of profit suffered by the petitioner on account of foreclosure of the contract.

( 3 ) I have heard the parties in respect of each of the claims. In the objections Filed, there is no objection filed to any other claim. As suchexceptforclaimsno. l,2,10and 11 the award is acceptable to the respondents. At the bar also, the respondent s counsel conceded that there was no opposition to the award in respect of Claims No. 3,to 9 and in the light of legal position as settled the objections Nos. 10 and 11 are not pressed and












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top