J.K.MEHRA
S. SONY AND COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE are objections on behalf of the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "dda" under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act to the award of Shri R. K. Sundram, Sole arbitrator dated 16th March 1990. The award is in respect of the claims that arose out of the contract for plumbing and sanitary work in the players block of Indira Gandhi Indoor Stadium Complex which was to be used for the Asian Games.
( 2 ) NOTICE of the filing of the award was served on DDA on 17. 9. 90 and the present objections by DDA were filed on 17th October 1990. Thus the objections appear to be within time. The claims appear to be based on alleged loss of profit suffered by the petitioner on account of foreclosure of the contract.
( 3 ) I have heard the parties in respect of each of the claims. In the objections Filed, there is no objection filed to any other claim. As suchexceptforclaimsno. l,2,10and 11 the award is acceptable to the respondents. At the bar also, the respondent s counsel conceded that there was no opposition to the award in respect of Claims No. 3,to 9 and in the light of legal position as settled the objections Nos. 10 and 11 are not pressed and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.