R.L.GUPTA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
DHANPAL DHANNU – Appellant
Versus
SUKHBIR SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two criminal appeal Nos. 18 and 25 of 1988 have been filed by Dhanpal alias Dhannu and Sukhbir Singh respectively (hereinafter described as DP and SS) against their conviction under Section 302 and 201 read with Section 34 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code and sentence of four years and also a fine of 2,0001- each under Section 201134 Indian Penal Code or in default of payment of fine further Rigorous Imprisonment of six months each by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi.
( 2 ) REFINERY and Patrochemicals Limited and Others Construction Co.) on. 1-2-1989 only stated thet it had "constructed over 300 cubic metre of brick masonry for the packing plant and D. G. Building totalling to 327. 29 cubic metre during the month of June 1985". These certificates, it is submitted, do not come upto the requirements of Para 1. We think that this criticism, based on the differences in wording as between the language of para 1 and the certificates produced by the MCC (Mysore Construction Co.), is too weak to be accepted. It was for the KPC Karnataka Power Corporation Limited) to consider the sufficienc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.