SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 55

ARUN B.SAHARYA, MAHINDER NARAIN
RAM NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.S.VASHISHT

Mahinder Narain

( 1 ) IN this Regular First Appeal, the appellants seek enhancement of compensation for acquisition in respect of land measuring 130 bighas 14 biswas and in addition, half share in 14 biswas of land, all of which was located in village Pausangipur.

( 2 ) LAND measuring 1669 bighas 18 biswas in the revenue estate of Pausangipur was acquired for planned development of Delhi vide notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. 1894 on 24th October, 1961. The Land Acquisition Collector gave his awards No. 1698 dated 31st March, 1964 and assessed compensation of land of Block a at Rs. 1,400. 00 per bigha and Block b at Rs. 1,200. 00 per bigha.

( 3 ) THE appellants received the awarded amount under protest and filed a reference undersection 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. While deciding the reference, the Addl. District Judge enhanced compensation of land measuring 33 bighas 10 biswas to Rs. 3,050. 00 per bigha, 53 bighas 10 biswas to Rs. 3,250. 00 per bigha and 44 bighas 1/2 biswa to Rs. 3,3000. 00 per bigha.

( 4 ) DISSATISFIED with the enhancement of compensation, the appellants have appealed to this Court. They assert that the developed colonies such as Sh








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top