SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 35

S.C.JAIN
EKTA GARMENTS – Appellant
Versus
SWATANTAR KAURAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.P.WIG, KRISHAN KUMAR GOGNA

S. C. Jain, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by EKTA Garments, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner challenging the order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 14. 2. 1990 whereby the order of the Addl. Rent Controller dated 13. 12. 89 striking out the defence of the petitioner was confirmed and the appeal against that order was dismessed.

( 2 ) IN brief, the facts of the case are that the Addl. Rent Controller passed an order under Section 15 (1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act on 24. 2. 1987 directing the petitioner tenant to pay or deposit the arrears of rent w. e. f. , I. I 1. 85 at the rate of Rs. 240. 00 per month. The arrears were to be paid within one month from the date of the order and future rent month by month by 15th of each succeeding month. The petitioner, as per the order of the court, paid a sum of Rs. 4080. 00 as arrears of rent to the landlady but failed to pay or deposit rent for October, 1988 onwards in the court of the concerned Addl. Rent Controller necessitating the respondent landlady to file an application under Section 15 (7) of the Delhi Rent Control Act for striking out the defence of the tenant petiti









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top