( 1 ) IANO. 318/92 This case reflects a sad commentary on the gross abuse of the process of the courts resulting in thwarting the Annual General Meeting (for short agm ) of Roshanara Club,defcndant No. l, and preventing its members from exercising their democratic right of franchise. By order dated November 11,1991 in the suit filed by the plaintiffs for declaration and injunction the Managing Committee of the Club was directed to meet within two weeks and fix a date for holding the agm before January 10,1991 under the Chairmanship of Justice J. D. Jain who was invested with all the necessary powers to carry out the purpose and spirit of the order. In view of this direction the counsel for the plaintiffs withdrew the suit, the same having been satisfied. He also withdrew all allegations against the defendants unconditionally. That seemed to be the end of the controversy. But that was not to be so.

( 2 ) ON January 8,1991 the date fixed by the defendant No. l for holding the agm pursuant to the order dated November 11,1991, two interlocutory injunctions one by Upper Civil Judge Magistrate,jaipur and the other by Sub Judge,delhi were served on (he defendant No.