Sunanda Bhandare, J.

( 1 ) IT is contended by the learned Counsel forthe petitioner that the D. D. A. was estopped from demanding payment inlump sum for a flat which was registered under the Registration Scheme onnew Pattern 1979 (for short Scheme) of intending purchasers of flats to beconstructed by the Delhi Development Authority. It is further submitted thatthe respondent has made a demand at escalated price which is not payable bythe petitioner. It is submitted that the Delhi Development Authority has notstated the total number of flats allotted by them under the Scheme on Hire Purchase basis or on Cash Down basis. Learned Counsel for the petitioner referredto the judgment of this Court in D. D. A. Flats App. Association v. Delhi Development Authority, 1987 RLR 514 and submitted that the question raised by himis directly covered by the judgment of this Court.

( 2 ) IT is contended by the learned Counsel for the respondent thatunder the Scheme itself 40% of the M. I. G. flats were to be allotted on Cashdown basis and 60% of the flats on Hire Purchase basis. The Delhi Development Authority has allotted flats by draw of lots of the flats through computersas and when the flats were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document