SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 1

High Court Of Delhi
STATE - Appellant
Versus
HINDU HERITAGE RESEARCH FOUNDATION CHARITABLE AND RELIGIONS TRUST - Respondent
Civil 4 of 1991
Decided On : 01/01/1992

Advocates Appeared:
CHETAN SHARMA, KISHAN KUMAR

The trustees of a charitable trust have the implied power to change the name of the trust if such change is in the best interest of the trust and promotes its objects.

Headnote:

CHARITABLE TRUST - CHANGE OF NAME - POWER OF TRUSTEES - INTERPRETATION OF TRUST DEED - HINDU HERITAGE RESEARCH FOUNDATION - INDIA HERITAGE RESEARCH FOUNDATION - MEANING AND SCOPE OF THE TERM "HINDU" - HINDUISM AS A WAY OF LIFE - TOLERANCE AND ACCEPTANCE OF DIVERSITY - SPIRIT OF UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD - NON-VIOLENCE AND COMPASSION - TRUSTEES' POWER TO CHANGE NAME IMPLIED IN TRUST DEED - CHANGE OF NAME IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE TRUST AND PROMOTION OF ITS OBJECTS - RESOLUTION OF TRUSTEES VALID.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, Chairman and Author of the Hindu Heritage Research Foundation (Sanatan Dharma Shodh Pratishthan), filed a petition under Section 7 of the Charitable and Religious Trust Act, 1920, seeking the opinion, advice, and direction of the court for changing the name of the trust to India Heritage Research Foundation. The petitioner contended that the word "Hindu" in the trust deed was being misunderstood by the general public to mean a specific religion, which was contrary to the intention of the trust. The trustees passed a resolution approving the change of name.

Finding of the Court:

The court observed that the word "Hindu" is derived from the river Sindhu and has a historical and etymological significance. It is associated with the territory drained by the Sindhu River system and does not imply a specific religion. Hinduism is a way of life that accommodates all forms of beliefs and worships without requiring the elimination or exclusion of any. It is a fusion of faiths and an alliance of philosophies, allowing Hindus to embrace non-Hindu religions without ceasing to be Hindus.

Issues: 1. Whether the trustees have the power to change the name of the trust. 2. Whether the change of name is in the best interest of the trust and promotes its objects.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the trustees have the implied power to change the name of the trust as such a power is necessary for the proper functioning and administration of the trust. 2. The court found that the change of name from Hindu Heritage Research Foundation to India Heritage Research Foundation is in the best interest of the trust as it promotes the objects of the trust and does not militate against its purpose. The new name is equally laudable and reflects the trust's commitment to preserving and promoting India's rich cultural heritage.

Final Decision: The court allowed the trustees to change the name of the trust to India Heritage Research Foundation and held that the resolution passed by the trustees in this regard is valid and can be given effect to immediately.

Anil Dev Singh

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 7 of the Chritable and Religious triust Act 1920 (for short, the Act) by the petitioner -who is the Chairman and Author of the Trust known as Hindu Heritage Research Foundation. (Sanatan Dharma Shodh Pratishthan) seeking opinion advice of direction for changing the name of the said Trust to India Heritage Research Foundation,

( 2 ) BY a Trust Deed dated January" 19,1989. the petitioner Swami Chidanand Saraswati set up the aforesaid Trust, The objects of the Trust are given in para No. 5 of the Trust Deed, which are as follows:-

" (I) to prepare and publish a multi volume encyclopedia and other publications; (ii) to promote exchange of scholars between India and the rest of the world; (iii) to encourage and promote education all round, for the development of spiritual values and character; (iv) to advance and promote any other object of spiritual and charitable nature; (v) to infuse spirit in the people of India to effectively discharge their fundamental duties assigned under the Constitution of India, specially under Clauses (e), (f), (h) and (j) of Article 51-A and as given below: (a) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people. (b) to value and preserve the rich heritage of Indian culture. (c) to develop the scientific temper, universal love and the spirit of inquiry and reform. (d) to strive for excellence and service in all spheres of individual and collective activities. (vi) to organise social service. activities that are geared to relieve human sufferings without restriction of caste, creed, religion or nation: (vii) to cary on activities for charitable purposes including relief of the poor, education, medical relief and the advancement of any other object of general public utility and such other activities as may be permitted for charitable purpose under the Income-Tax Act, 1961. "

( 3 ) A reading of the objects show, that the Trust is meant, infer alta to render service to the humanity, preserve the cultural heritage of India, ameliorate suffering of the people foster the bonds of brotherhood amongst them. In the petition it is stated that the Trust was set up for the benefit of entire man-kind without any distinction of caste, creed, religion and nation. It is further stated that the name of this Trust in Hindi is sanatan Dharma Sanskrit Shodha Pratisthan, which means universal dharma and is not confined to any particular religion. Petition further avers that English rendering of the name of the Trust, which has been mentioned in the Trust Deed, is hindu Heritage Research Foundation . According to the petitioner, the word hindu as used in the said Trust Deed is being misunderstood by the General Public to mean, hindu as a specific religion, which is contrary to the intention of the petitioner. It is further stated in the petition that "the petitioner as well as the Trustees of the Trust are of the considered view that the name of the charitably Trust may be redefined as India Heritage Research Foundation . The petition maintains that the Trustees passed a resolution dated January 27, 1991, approving the change of the name of the Trust.

( 4 ) IT seems that the petitioner and trustees are not sure as regards their power for effecting the necessary change in the name. The Trustees through the petitioner, therefore, in order to seek clarification and clear the misunderstanding about their own power to change the name, have come up to this Court under Section 7 of the Act for appropriate opinion, advice and direction.

( 5 ) THE petition is supported by affidavits of each one of the Trustees. A copy of the aforesaid resolution of the Board of Trustees has also been filed. The relevant portion of the resolution reads as follows:

"the issue of change of name of the Trust to india Heritage Research Foundation was further discussed. Mr. Kumar stated that since there was no specific power provided in the Trust Deed, it would be a


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top