SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 82

S.C.JAIN
SURESH SARVARIA – Appellant
Versus
KANTA PD. GARG – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.AGGARWAL, I.S.MATHUR, V.K.Makhija

S. C. Jain

( 1 ) RECORD perused. The respondent who is an employee of NCERT filed an eviction petition under Section 14 (1) (e) read with Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act for eviction of the respondent (Petitioner) from the tenanted premises on the ground of bonafide personal requirement. Summons as prescribed under Schedule III of the Delhi Rent Control Act were issued to the tenant petitioner herein who appeared and filed an application seeking leave to defend. Grounds taken by the petitioner were that the purpose of letting was residential-cum-commercial and that the respondent landlord did not need the premises in suit bonafide. The Rent Controller did not find any favour with both these pleas taken by the petitioner tenant and ultimately declined the request of the tenant to grant leave to defend and a decree for eviction was passed. Aggrieved this revision petition has been filed.

( 2 ) AS far as the purpose of letting is concerned, in para 14 of the eviction petition it has been specifically mentioned that the premises were let out to the tenant for residential purpose on 1. 7. 77 and the tenant had executed a rent note, a copy of which was attached with the evictio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top