SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 72

C.M.NAYAR
ANITA SARWAL – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK SARWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.NIGAM, NANDINI SAHNI

C. M. Nayar

( 1 ) THE preseat petition is directed against the order of Additional District Judge dated October 11, 1991, only to the extent that he declined to waive the second Motion under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, (hereinafter referred to as t Act) and has not passed any order with regard to the same. The decree for divorce was prayed under Section 13-B of the Act, without waiting for the statutory period of six months.

( 2 ) THE brief facts of the case are that the petitioner and respondent were married on December, 14, 1987 at Delhi according to Hindu rites. The parties resided and lived together as husband and wife till 17th August, 1990. No child has been born out of the wedlock. The parties separated from each other and started living separately since August 17, 1990, in view of the irreconcilable differences between them. The petitioner filed a criminal complaint registered as FIR No 26 3 of 1990, inter alia under Section 498-A/406/34 IPC with police station Chitranjan Park, Nanakpura, New Delhi. The relations, friends, as well as, well-wishers of both the parties voluntarily and mutually were able to settle their differences in respect of their rights a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top