SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 132

S.C.JAIN
ORIENT EXPRESS COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
USHA PASRICHA – Respondent


S. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) A limited tenancy was crealred on 4. 2. 1981 for three years with respect to First floor of 112, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi in favour of Orient Express Co. (PO) Ltd, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner. After expiry of the limited period of tenacy, the petitioner did not vacate the premises necessitating the landlady to file an execution application. Notice was sent to the petitioner. During the execution proceedings, the petitioner tenant filed objections under Section 21 of the Delhi Rent Control Act. An amendment application was also filed for amending the objections. Objection was taken by the landlady that the objections Filed by the tenant were not mantainable in view of the pronouncements made by the Supreme Court in various decisions. However, the Addl Rent Controller recorded the evidence on the objections and after appreciating the evidence on record the Addl Rent Conuller vide his detailed order dated 17. 12. 1991 dismissed the objections filed under Section 21 and ordered issuance of the warrant of possession against the petitioner. Aggrieved the petitioner Filed an appeal before the Rent Control Tribunal, who confirmed the findings of the Addl R








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top