( 1 ) I do not propose to take long. I should not, for,the situation is still in a state of flux and it would be would be too hazardousto venture into the specifics. What is required at present is to take a prima fadeview and this is precisely what I propose to do. However, first a brief resumeof the facts.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has been granted an Industrial Power (LT) connectionfor small power consumers which is being used for the purpose of manufacturing of paints being carried on by the, company M/s. U. K. Paints (1) India.

( 3 ) ONLY on 8/01/1992 the plaintiff a writ petition had obtained an orderstaying disconnection of supply of electricity due to non-payment of the billstreating the said connection as Large Industrial Power connection. On January 10, a large contingent the employees of Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (hereinafter called the Undertaking) swooped on the premises and made certaininspections. Alarmed by the action the plaintiff addressed a latter datedjanuary 11, 1992 to the Undertaking requesting a joint inspection. There wasno response. However, on or about January 17, the plaintiff received whatpurported to be the record of inspection carried out