SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 84

SANTOSH DUGGAL, B.N.KIRPAL
JAY INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
NAKSON INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.AGARWAL, M.L.MANGALA

B. N. KIRPAL, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THE question which has been referred to this Bench, by a Single Judge of this Court, tor decision is whether a single suit can be filed when it is alleged that there has been an infringement of the plaintiff s trade mark and copy right. In other words can one suit be filed in relation to two distinct statutory causes of action.

( 2 ). The plaintiff in the suit had alleged that the defendant had infringed the plaintiff s registered trade mark and also its copy right. The allegation was that the plaintiff s copy right existed on the labels and carton? in which goods had been packed which carried the trade mark of the plaintiff. With regard to the trade mark the allegation was that-the plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the mark "jay". It was also: alleged, with relation to the copy right, that the plaintiff had been using distinctive cartons in which the goods manufactured by the plaintiff namely, locks, meters, cut outs etc. were packed. It was further alleged in the plaint that the defendant was infringing the plaintiff s aforesaid registered trade mark and also the copy right which existed in the artistic work on the cartons of the plaintiff. B







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top