SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 106

MOHD.SHAMIM
CHIYODA CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL FERTILIZERS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.P.SHANKAR DAS, Vandana Chetal, Vibhu Shankar

MOHD. SHAMIM

( 1 ) THIS is an application by the plaintiff under S. 152 of the Civil Procedure Code for recalling and modifying the judgment and order dt. Nov. 22, 1991 passed by this Court.

( 2 ) THE petitioner/plaintiff through the present application wants that the Suit No. 910 of 1989 which was dismissed against defendant No. 1 on the basis of the statement made by the counsel for the plaintiff be restored to its original number and be allowed to be proceeded with against defendant No. 1.

( 3 ) I have heard the learned counsel for the plaintiff at sufficient length and have very carefully examined the facts of the present case and have given my anxious thoughts thereto.

( 4 ) A perusal of the record reveals that Suit No. 910/89 was filed by the plaintiff against the two defendants i. e. National Fertilizer Ltd. , defendant No. 1, and SOIL India Ltd. , defendant No. 2. The defendant No. 2 neither put in appearance nor applied for leave to defend despite sufficient service. Hence, the plaintiff became entitled to a decree under O. 37, R. 3, Civil Procedure Code against them. Consequently, the suit was decreed against defendant No. 2. However, learned counsel for the plaintiff whil


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top