SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 220

B.N.KIRPAL, SANTOSH DUGGAL
EICHER MOTORS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MADAN LOKUR, R.H.PANCHOLI, V.Sridharan

B. N. KIRPAL, J.

( 1 ) THE challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed by the Customs, Excise and ld (Control) Appellate Tribunal who have directed that on the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs. 8 Lakhs there will be stay of realisation of pre-deposit of the duty amounting to Rs. 23,17,959. 24 and penalty of Rs. 7 Lakhs, and have further directed that the appeal would be heard on the payment of the said amount of Rs. 8 Lakhs.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY slated the facts are that the petitioner is a manufacturer of motor vehicles. The petitioner manufactures and supplies chassis to the body builders. These chassis are supplied after the excise duty has been paid and clearance obtained from the department. The body builder manufactures complete bus by fabricating the body on the chassis and, after paying a duty of Rs. 8,400. 00 , returns the bus to the petitioner. The petitioner carries out inspection of the said bus and thereafter the same is sold to various customers.

( 3 ) THE excise authorities, apart from recovering duty on the chassis manufactured by the petitioner and a fixed duty on the bus manfactured by the body builder, also demanded a duty of Rs. 8,400. 00 from the petitione












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top