SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Del) 326

ARUN KUMAR
V. K. CONSTRUCTIONS WORKS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF RAJASTHEN LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.JAIN, A.K.TEWARI, ARUN MOHAN, MADAN BHATIA

ARUN KUMAR,j.

( 1 ) THIS order will dispose of the interim applications filed by the plaintiff in the above suits to restrain the defendant from encashing the bank guarantees furnished by the plaintiff in pursuance of the contract between the parties. These are six suits filed by the plaintiff M/s V. K. Constructions Works Ltd. against the Army Welfare Housing Organisation. There are six Independent contracts between the parties and therefore these six suits. In each case there are two applications by the plaintiff regarding relief of injunction sought by the plaintiff against encashment of bank guarantees by the defendant. This order will dispose of all the 12 applications. Two sets of bank guarantees are involved. One set is regarding bank guarantees for the due repayment of the mobilization advance. The other set of bank guarantees is that of the performance guarantees. The Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. , Panchsheel Park, New Delhi has furnished all the bank guarantees. The letters of invocation of bank guarantees are similar in language and content in all the cases, except for the variation in the amounts. The language of the bank guarantees to cover the mobilization advance is identi












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top