MOHINDER NARAIN
HIDESIGN – Appellant
Versus
HI-DESIGN CREATIONS – Respondent
( 1 ) THE plaintiff Mrs. Pampa Kapoor is carrying o the business under the name of M/s HIDESIGN at and from 4, Caserne Stree? Post Box No. 92, Pondicherry. It is stated in the plaint that she is engaged in the business of manufacturing, processing, exporting and selling feather garments, bags, belts, brief cases, wallets etc. for the past several years.
1a. It is asserted by the plaintiff that the plaintiff adopted the trade mark HIDESIGN, which was represented in a special and particular manner on 5. 5. 1977. tt is stated that the plaintiff used the mark not only as a trade mark, but also a trade description, and it is further stated that the said mark appears permanently on all the products and all the literature of the plaintiff during the course of her business.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff claims that she is the prior adopter of the said t A mark vis-a-vis the defendant, and is entitled to use the said name as a prior adopter of the said "design". It is also asserted that in view of the established business and sale promotion and extensive and continuous regular commercial user, the said trade mark HIDESIGN had acquired secondary meaning with regard to the goods of the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.