SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 45

P.N.NAG
RABINDRA LAL AICH – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L.Nayar, Keshav Dayal, MADAN BHATIA, R.DAYAL

P. N. Nag

( 1 ) IN this application under Order I Rule 10, Order 6 Rule 17 and Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 the petitioners seek an amendment of the writ petition, which has been vehemently opposed by counsel for respondents.

( 2 ) THE short relevant facts which have necessitated this application for amendment are that one of the reliefs prayed for by the petitioners in this writ petition was that they were appointed as General Duty Officers Grade-11 somewhere in 1978 and since they worked continuously in that job, they should have been regularised w. e. f. the dates they were appointed as General Duty Officers Grade-11. It appears that during the pendency of the writ petition, partial relief has been allowed by the department and the petitioners have been regularised by the respondent-Corporation on the recommendations of the Union Public Service Commission with effect from 27. 12. 1980. The petitioners now claim that consequent on the regularisation w. e. f. 27. 12. 1980 their seniority should also reckon from the aforementioned date.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the petitioners, nevertheless the respondents have issued a seniority list, annexure J, vide which they have bee






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top