SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 72

S.C.JAIN, N.N.GOSWAMY
ROHTAS FINANCIERS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SHARMA, K.C.Kalra, K.K.Mehra

S. G. Jain, J.

( 1 ) FACTS giving rise to this appeal are that M/s. Rohtas Financiers (P) Ltd. and its directors (hereinafter referred as the Appellants) on the one side and Lakshmi Commercial Bank Ltd , which has now merged into Canara Bank (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent) on the other referred the disputes arising out of a cash credit limit allowed by the respondent bank to the appellants to the arbitration of Sh. Bikram Singh advocate as per the agreement dated 15th March, 1967. The arbitrator entered upon the reference and proceedings were filed in the court. Neither party filed any objections and rather a request had been made by the parties through their counsel to make the same a rule of the court. Consequently, the court made the award a rule of the court and a decree was awarded in its terms on 10th May, 1967.

( 2 ). The appellants challenged the award dated 15th March, 1967 and the decree passed thereon in suit No. 234 of 1967 by filing a suit No. 329 of 1968 in the court. In para 13 of the plaint the appellants averred that fra had been played upon them and upon this court. The particulars of fraud given are:-

(A) that the blank signed papers had been filed in


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top