SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 86

P.N.NAG
BABU LAL – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.Kalra, P.DEVAN

P. N. Nag,j.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 13th March, 1990 passed by Shri V. S. Aggarwal, Additional District Judge Delhi wherein he has dismissed an application underorder 39 Rules 1and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed on behalf of the petitioner-plaintiff restraining the respondent-defendant from dispossessing the petitioner from the shop bearing No. 3/45, New Link Road, New Dilhi on the ground that the appellant-petitioner is in possession of the shop as owner of the same.

( 2 ) LEARNED Additional District Judge, after having discussed the matter, has come to the prima facie finding that the petitioner is not the owner of the shop and be. has not come with clean hands and, therefore not entitled to the relief asked for by him.

( 3 ) FROM the judgment, it appears that the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant before the Additional District Judge was that even if it is assured that he is a trespasser, he cannot be dispossessed by the owner without recourse to law. The learned Additional District Judge, however, has not considered this aspect of the matter.

( 4 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitio






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top