SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 85

ARUN KUMAR, M.C.JAIN
FOURESS ENGINIRING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DELHI ADMINISTRATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Malik, NEMO K.PARASARAN, VINAY BHASIN

M. C. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order dated 4th August 1982, passed by the learned Single Judge in C. M. No. 1225 of 1986 in C. W. P. No. 1697 of 1982.

( 2 ) IT appears that the order was passed on the application of respondent No. 3 which was an application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for modifying the earlier order on the stay application passed on 10. 1. 1983. By that order the present appellant was directed to make payment of half of the back wages without security and there was a further direction to the appellant to continue to pay half of the salary allowances to the workman till the disposal of the writ petition. In continuation of this order dated 20th December, 1982, the learned Judge on 10th January, 1983 ordered that payment should be made @ Rs. 400. 00 per month for the purpose of back wages and for future payments.

( 3 ) BY the impugned order the learned Judge modified the earlier order and a direction was given that the payment should be made @ Rs. 615 per month and differential payment of a sum of Rs. 215. 00 per month be made as back wages.

( 4 ) MR. Vinay Bhasin, counsel for the appellant, submitted that the impugned o










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top