SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 141

P.N.NAG
HANSRAJ PRUSHOTTAM DASS – Appellant
Versus
SUMAN JAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAKESH TIKKU, SATISH SAHAI

P. N. Nag

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the order dated 25th May, 1989 passed by Shri Ghansham Dass Gupta, Sub Judge 1st Class. Delhi whereby the applications of the defendants-petitioners under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and also under Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act have been dismissed.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this revision petition are that a suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed by the plaintiff-respondent against petitioner No. I through its sole proprietor, late Shri Hans Raj. At this stage it may be noted that the petitioners are the legal heirs of Shri Hans. Raj, deceased. An application for leave to defend filed by Shri Hans Raj before the trial Court was dismissed in default on 6. 1. 1988 and consequently a decree was passed against Shri Hans Raj, the defendant. The defendant, Hans Raj, during his life time filed an application under Order 37 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 on 13. 1. 1988 for restoration of the application and consequently for setting aside the decree, which was dismissed in default on 6. 1. 1988. (sic)






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top