SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 166

V.B.BANSAL
STATE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRASWAMY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Mishra, S.Lal

V. B. Bansal

( 1 ) BY way of this application a prayer has been made by the C. B. L for modification of the order dated 17. 12. 1990 of Chawla, J, thereby confirming the interim bail order relating to Chandraswamy-respondent and it has been further requested that the conditions as imposed on co. accused K. N. Aggarwal may also be ordered to be imposed on the respondent.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts leading to the filing of this application are as under:

ON 25th of May, 1990fir/crim. No. 1 (SIG) (S)/90 was registered by Delhi Special Police Establishment for the offences undersection 120-B. I. P. C. read with Sections 182/193/218/465/469/ 471 and 500 Indian Penal Code. and substantive offences under Sections 182/193/ 218/465/469/471/500 Indian Penal Code.-Six persons were named as accused including Chandraswamy-respondent and K. N. Aggarwal alias Mama Ji.

( 3 ) ON a petition being Crl. M. (M) 2683/90 moved by Chandraswamy, respondent an order was passed on 23. 11. 90 to the effect that the petitioner shall not be arrested in this case. The case was adjourned to 26th of November, 1990 and thereafter on 17th of November, 1990 the interim order of the petitioner was confirmed in view o







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top