SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 219

S.C.JAIN
ASBRAF ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Sharma, MOSHAHID ASDAQUE, SYED ALI AHAMED, TASLIM AHMEDI

S C. Jain, J.

( 1 ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal are that on receipt of a secret information in the Crime Branch Office of Delhi Police on 1. 5. 1987, S L , Hari Singh organised a raiding parly consisting of ASI Jasbir Singh, ASI Ram Partap. HC Kamal Singh, HC Jamaludin, Constables Dbaramvir, Balbir Singh, Same Singh, Devi Bharan, Dalip Kumar, Prem Chand, Addesh Kumari under the supervision of Inspector Omvir Singh at about 5 a. m. No person from the public was included in the raiding party, as nobody showed his inclination to join the same despite request made by the police officers. Nakabandi was made at T-point at Lodhi Road and Dargah Nizamuddin road at about 7 am on the pointing out of the informer, the appeilant Ashraf along with another person Nasiruddin were apprehended. Both of them were having one thela (bag) each in their hands. They were given an offer whether they wou!d like to be searched before a gazetted officer or a magistrate but they refused. From the search of the bag which the appellant Ashraf was holding in his hand, opium was recovered which on Weightment was found to be 3 kgs. 50 grams was taken out as sample. The sample as well as the remaining opiu








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top