( 1 ) BY this order I am to decide two applications one filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure and other by defendant No. 2b under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code.

( 2 ) THE suit is for dissolution of partnership, rendition of accounts, winding up and for perpetual injunction. There are two plaintiffs and in effect tour defendants. Partnership ls in t e name of competent Builders of which first plaintiff and the first defendant are the partners. This was constituted by a deed of partnership dated February 20, 1978. These two partners extended the business of partnership and started a unit under the name competent Motors . For this purpose they entered into an agreement dated July 19, 1983 called the supplementary Agreement of Partnership. Though this unit was part of the partnership competent Builders whose main business was that of builders and promoters of multi-storeyed buildings, this unit was to deal in automobiles. Then on September 1, 1983 an agreement was signed between the Competent Motors and defendant No. 3, manufacturers of cars, under the name "marnti , as dealers of these cars. Competent Motors for all