SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 262

S.C.JAIN
RAJU PERSHAD GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Sharma, SANJIV KUMAR

S. C. Jain, J.

( 1 ) RAJU Parsbaci Gupla, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, was convicted by the Addl Sessions Judge for an offence punishable under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for having in his possession 18 kgs charas without any licence or permit and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year by his judgment daled 31. 3. 1990.

( 2 ) IN brief the prosecution version is that on 6 6. 88, at 2. 20 p. m. a secret information was received at police station New Delhi Rly Station that a person was sitting near the latrine at the end of platform 10-11 at New Delhi Railway Station and he was in possession of charas. This information was reduced into writing in daily diary at SI No. 15-A (Ex. Public Witness 8/a) and it was passed on to Jai Narain SHO of police station New Delhi Railway Station At the instance of the SHO a raiding party was arranged by SI Ram Singh which included SI Rishi Pal Rana, HC Abhimanyu constable Darshan Singa, ASI Prem Nath Gupta and a witness from public Gopi Ram Jain At 245 p. m. , on the pointing of the informer the app








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top