SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 280

P.K.BAHRI
ALLAHABAD LAW JOURNAL COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SKYWAYS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION , OPPOSITE PARTIES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.S.Narula, J.P.Gupta

( 1 ) THIS is an application seeking amendment of the plaint with a. view to seek further relief of specific performance of agreement for sale.

( 2 ) THE application is opposed by defendants 1 to 3. Defendants No. 4 has been already proceeded ex parte in the main suit.

( 3 ) THE facts in brief are that plaintiff had entered into an agreement dated December 15, 1970 with defendant No. 1 through defendant No. 2 for the purchase of Flat No. 5a in Rajhans, 33, Prithvi Raj Road, New Delhi for consideration of Rs. 1,60,000. 00. The. building was yet to be constructed and the sum of Rs. 5,000. 00 was paid at the time of the signing of the agreement and balance amount was to be paid in 10 equal instalments.

( 4 ) PLAINTIFF, later on, had entered into an agreement with defendant No. 4 for selling its rights under the Agreement for sale in favour of defendant No. 4 for sale consideration of Rs. 2 lacs. This agreement was executed on November 22, 1972. It is the case of the plaintiff that Rs. 50,000. 00 still remain to be paid by defendant No. 4 to the plaintiff under the aforesaid agreement and defendant No. 4 was to pay the balance amount of Rupees 18,000. 00 due to defendant No. 1 from pla






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top