SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 303

B.N.KIRPAL, D.K.JAIN
A. K. GULATI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MADAN LOKUR, MUKUL ROHTAGI, S.K.TIWARI

B. N. Kirpal

( 1 ) THE petitioners before us are Private Secretaries who are attached to the Judges of this Court. The claim in this writ petition is that they should be placed in the pay-scale of Rs. 3000-4500 instead of the pay-scale of Rs. 2000-3500, which they are getting at present.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts are that prior to the 4th Pay Commission report, the petitioners were in the pay-scale of Rs. 775-1200. According to the provisions of the Delhi High Court (Staff Seniority) Rules, 1971, the posts of Private Secretary are being regarded as equal status posts with those of Superintendent and Court Master. There is a joint seniority list of all the three categories which is maintained. The next higher post to which all of them are eligible for being considered for selection is that of Assistant Registrar.

( 3 ) IN June, 1986, the 4th Pay Commission gave its recommendations. Two of the recommendation which are material are that Secretaries to the Government of India who were drawing a basic salary of Rs. 3500. 00 , were entitled to receive a basic salary of Rs. 8000. 00. Clause 9. 39 of the said Report further provided that in order to provide satisfactory promotional av









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top