SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 471

S.N.SAPRA
RAMA ASSOCIATION PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N.LEKHI, RAJIV NAYAR, Subhash Mittal

S. N. Sapra, J.

( 1 ) THE present revision petition is directed against the order dated February 15, 1989, whereby, the First Appellate Court, affirmed the order dated July 19, 1986, by which the trial Court had dismissed the application of petitioner, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code. , for grant of temporary Injunction.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts and circumstances, giving rise to the institution of the present petition, are as under : Petitioner, which Is a private limited company, obtained perpetual leasehold rights, from the Delhi Development Authority, respondent herein, in respect of plot No. B-10, Lawrence Road Industrial Area, New Delhi, for a consideration of Rs. 3,13,000. 00 , and a regular perpetual lease deed was executed. Thereafter, the construction was raised on the plot, after getting the necessary permission from the Authority from the Authorities. Petitioner has been running its own business in the premises. Clause 4 (a) of the lease deed provides that the lessee shall not sell. transfer, assign or otherwise part with possession of whole or any part of the industrial plot, except with the previous consent, in writing of the Lessor. It may be












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top