SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Del) 545

S.N.SAPRA
POONAM SOOD – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.JHA, Harish Malhotra

S. N. Sapra, J.

( 1 ) -THE present petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the Impugned order dated August 31, 1991, whereby, the learned trial Court, refused to grant ex-parte stay, to restrain respondents, from digging any pit or fixing any electric poles or putting any electric wire, through the land of petitioners.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS case Is that they are the owners in possession of various lands, comprised in Mutvil No. 80/16 Min 17, Min 18, Min Mutvil No. 80, Khasra No. 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 and 27 Min (2 and half acres) and in 12 bighas 1 biswas in Mutvil No. 80 khasra no. 22 Mutvil 94 Khasra No. 1/2, 2/1, 2/2 and 33 bighas in Mutvil No. , 93 Khasra No. 14, 15, 6/2, 13, 14 Mutvil 94 Khasra 1/1, Mutvil 80 Khasra No. 21/1, Mutvil 81 Khasra No. 16/3, 25, Mutvil 53 Khasra No. 19, 20, 21/2, 22, 23, 24 12/2 Mutvil 72 Khasra No. 1/2, 2, 3, 4 and 7 situated in village Kishan Garh, Mehrauli, New Delhi. Petitioners I to 4 are members of one family and the land, is being used for farm houses and agricultural purposes. Petitioners I to 3 have got sanctioned the plans, from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, for constructing the farm houses.

( 3 )

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top